Some might think that the current dispute between Denmark and some Western countries, and on the other side with the Islamic countries, as if it were a hostility, towards Islam, and a civilizational conflict which began after the events of 11 th September, from my neutral point of view, far from all these intimations about the theory of conspiracy that, for sorry, became a part of our Arabic culture, we cannot deny that some parties which think that Islam is the enemy of the Western community, have this feeling. Whatever good intentions we have, these thoughts were declined in many statements everywhere, the most famous was that was said by George Bosh when he said that the war upon Iraq is like the Crusade wars. And later he said that it was "just a slip of the tongue."

In my point of view, the main problem is the difference between the two cultures, an Arabic culture which has its definite principles and another one which has other principles. It is a natural and radical difference between two different cultures, different from each other in religion, history, geography, language, pedagogy, and the social dimension.

In their point of view, they think that the freedom of opinion is the most important thing they obtained and they insist very much on keeping it. They put no limits for their freedom. Despite of its merits, it means for them some unchangeable ideas about the freedom of taking illegal drugs, nudeness, sexual deviation, and having sex in streets; that was what I saw myself in Copenhagen.

For a more definite example; it was mentioned in a documentary program about Angelina Jolly, an actress, that when she was a teenager; her mother decided that her first boyfriend would live with them least Angelina met him in parks.

On the other hand, the Islamic community has its definite limits about freedom, in spite of the neediness for freedom merits that every one knows.

Islamic community bans "sex", nudeness, calumniation, cursing, and defamation of the family origins… etc and many of the principles that rule the Islamic community. So, it's very clear ,from the features of both cultures, the reason of this clash.

That point of view, which doesn't take side with the conspiracy theory, is proved by the fact that Muslims often do their religious rites freely in the western countries, they build their mosques and even some may get financial support under many names. Western countries still welcome the immigrants and scientists from the Islamic countries. Denmark itself admits with the freedom of religion and we can find there mosques for Al-Sona and others for Al-Gama'a Al-Ahmadia, even the Sufi groups have their place in Copenhagen , and there is one in Vodofga.

This proves that the case is not a case of hostility towards Islam, as many may depict, but it is a mere radical difference between cultures. This difference should be solved by discussion, adjustment, correctness, and an attempt of a common understanding; not by anger, revolution, aggression, and the exchanged abuses.

The abuse portraits were just for abuse that was a result from the wrong understanding of the opinion freedom and is the same by which Bosh invaded Iraq and Afghanistan and said: "I deceived you".

The western countries, all the time, are talking about the freedom of opinion, but meanwhile, if a boy was abused by his mother, he would pay it back twofold of the foreign abuses dictionary, that we may know most of it because of the open space broadcasting, or even he would beat him as Vandam might do with criminals, as we see in their social life that we know well through movies, media, the direct knowledge, and the man nature. So, what we think about the person who is dearer than mother, father, and son, the person who is Mohamed "best prayer upon him".

They may say that these abuse portraits are an application for such freedom, when freedom is innocent from such accusation, accusation of this wrong understanding that many may think about. Freedom is a mysterious word that is still not defined or limited yet. It should have its limits so it will not be in a conflict with bases and principles of the society.

If we let "Freedom" with no limits, suddenly we will find nude men and women walking and riding motor bikes in the streets; as what happens now in western cities and published by some news agencies.

Fro example, in some place in Copenhagen that is called Christiana; the young people offer different kinds of illegal drugs on tables, you may feel as if it were an international gallery for illegal drugs. When I wondered about the reason of government's ignorance of that activity; I was answered by that the government wants to decrease the spreading of drugs such as Heroin that kills many of the Danish youth, but by what? By making the dry narcotics, as Hashish, Margwana, and many other kinds, more available! This is the freedom in their point of view, the freedom of opinion that they call for that implies criticism, abuse sex and illegal drugs.

The abuse portraits hurt all Muslims in all countries as it hurt their religion, faith, and the biography of their prophet (who is dearer than sons and money at all) in an dishonest way that is called by the laymen; "beating in the banned area", that doesn't exist in the game rules. It defers from all the rules and principles, it is completely different from the Cavalry manners that were advised and recorded by history in many stories, as there are some ethics for discussions, also there are the ethics of criticism and differences, even war has its ethics which are known by nobles, for example; the leader who bent for the dead body of his enemy out of respect. And also there are the ethics of dealing with the prisoners of war which were admitted by Islam.

There is no relation between the abuse portraits and the freedom of opinion or criticism; it is just for abuse, calumny, excessiveness, and exaggeration that are practiced by a group of some Christian extravagants; it seems like when someone abuse you in the street and quickly run away. But criticism has its rules and ethics which were based by Islam.

The western itself was the first enemy of the freedom of opinion when some countries had announced "The law of the Hostility of the new Worship of Al-Sameia", which chased and arrest anyone who declares his own point of view and denies the existence of what called "Holocaust", for example; the French thinker Rouge Garwood.

The abuse portraits should be considered as a pierce, "civilizational pierce" exactly as if some one pricks you in order to pick a quarrel with you out of his jealousy and envy because of your success and glory. We should deal with these portraits in a very calm and smart confidence. We should be aware of the Western neediness to the correctness, guidance, discussion and advice about many principles, first; the freedom of opinion. We should be more confident as we have a great civilization and ethics that others did not reach yet.

The abuse portraits are as dangerous as playing with fire. It strengthens and increases the hatred and hostility in a time we call for the unity of the universe. The Egyptian adage says; "What doesn't kill, strengthens". And never forget that Islam enemies were always just marginal whatever time and place were, starting with the century of the dignified prophet till the end of the world.

We should have confidence as they, whatever their number is huge, will never affect the everlasting message that God promised to preserve in the Holy Quor'an.

We should make them feel that they did not get over us; there is no reason of their false glory, no reason for their desire of fighting and getting into troubles. We should deal with them according to our historical responsibility towards them; to guide and advise them in a very kind way as in the Ayah (verse of Quor'an) that says; "Mercy for all".

We should never stop explaining our great Islamic principles and let the first lesson be:" How to deal according to the view of Islam".