Because we are in the Arab world that is haunted with mental illness and worn traditions, which has the power of religion, because we are, despite our history, we did not achieve any advance, because we are in an era of defeats, defeated in education and awareness, culture and freedom battles; we are still dominated society by the tribes rules, which are full of rumors and reputation, then I agree – have to actually - to denigration of religions Law .

Human freedom is the origin, freedom of belief and thinking. Islam encouraged us to think, forethought and diligence and realization of the mind, Islam is not a religion of the priesthood that you must believe in without words, but a religion of reason, diligence and freedom, but some people try to make use out of it, and make it a whip and a tool for repression, imprisonment and hunt political opponents.

 the law of "denigration of religions” ; is made for the punishment of those who insult, degrade or insult the three religions ; Islam, Christian and Jewish faiths. and despite my belief in the principle that the Muslim can’t abuse any faith, do not insult a person or group, as that of the creation of Islam, but I object to this law which could open a wide door to abuse and misinterpretation, to be a tool of repression, and turns the subject of defamation of religions to the denigration of ideas .

I object to this law for several reasons: first, thinking, diligence, question and search are the virtues urged us by Islam, though, if we ignore them, we will become like animals that do not think, and such a law will engulf both the mind and threatens the good thinking, prevents diligence. Thinking and committing mistakes are the nature of life .. The possibility of a fundamental error in any human activity, and this law may prey on human error, it puts many loyalties to the thinker who observe a case, and so we have circled the intellect rather than the siege of abuses.

The second reason is that There is a difference between thought and insults, but in the absence of clear criteria of the law will highlight the personal interpretations, which some may put under penalty of law, and the proof is that a court acquitted Islam El Beheriy, another court found him guilty in the same case and sentenced him to 5 years prison.

Who burns the Bible at the sight of the people, cannot be compared to a writer or media or thinker discusses the religious issue, and have offered his words or views; some considered that as an affront to a particular religion, but the law defined legal terms would be equivalent to everyone.

The third reason is: at the time of the stress on the freedom of opinion and expression as a strong guarantee of any society, the "denigration of religions" could be ready to charge use of power or individuals to avenge the media, intellectuals. In addition to the negative effects of the moral to this charge, and that does not go away until the acquittal accused can already be punished by a fine, or imprisonment, according to the law .

 The fourth reason: is that the application of such a law would open the discussion and debate about the many thorny issues that we're not qualified for, unfortunately, to be resolved, such as the holy and unholy, and infallibility and limits, of criticism and freedom of expression; all of which are vague topics that Muslims failed to resolve despite the passage of more than 14 centuries since the advent of Islam .

I do object to the law, but unfortunately I have to accept it, and the reason that what comes from the people the right of religion, even if the aim of intellectual or research, or even an innocent personal opinion. It could raise the followers of this religion, which is not doomed, as it relates to culture, social, or personal to humans, which could ultimately threaten social peace . . If the Egyptian society has adequate degree of awareness for our rejection of such a law, and blamed a man who knows right and wrong, but because the Arab society is still a minor, is a revenge masculinity, violence , family and social customs and traditions, we will have to keep the law .

 All that we can do, even reduce the side effects of this law to prevent negative punishment of freedom in it, and only a fine Avatar which will be aimed at restraining the alarm, which should happen in every publication and opinion and thought in general issues.