Every day, the news agencies show us the results of different researches in different countries. The media means and the newspapers publish them for the public who listen and read it and, of course, they are not only affected by them. But also they practice them personally.

Here you are a research about the usefulness of the pineapple and its benefit for the blood pressure. Other researches are about the green tea and its benefit for losing weight. Others assert the role of cauliflower in the protection from cancer. It's very odd that most of these researches are contrasting for each other. There was a search about the importance of water to those who want to lose weight and also its benefit for the kidneys. Another search asserts that drinking huge quantities of water may cause death.

The result of any search is not affirmative as it also was about a definite specimen that differs according to the different considerations of the scientists. It also may be a missing part of another researches and experiments.

Of course I do not undervalue the scientists' efforts, but I am asking for a little control on this flow of searches and results which are published for the public who, as a result, accept it and put it into practice without being sure of its benefits. So, I suggest that we classify these searches into two sorts; the first one will be the searches which can be put into practice as they were completely asserted to be safe till the final result, and the other will be the searches which are not advised to be put into practice, as they are still a part of other searches and need to be studied, compared and asserted.

Another suggestion is founding an international organization which is specialized for medical searches which are asserted to be safe and put into practice. And also publish an international medical newspaper, so every one can make use of it with no fear or doubt.